A Socially Assistive Robot for Outpatient Eating Disorder Waiting-List Support: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.

Eur Eat Disord RevJun 26, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchPsychiatry

Dimitri Chubinidze, Zhuo Li, Ayse Gundogan et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This mixed-methods feasibility randomised controlled trial assessed Purrble, a socially assistive robot intended to support emotion regulation, among adults waiting for outpatient eating disorder treatment. Participants were assigned to four weeks of Purrble use or waitlist-as-usual; 37 of 39 enrolled participants were retained. Depression symptoms decreased more in the Purrble group, with a significant group-by-time interaction. No significant between-group interactions were found for emotion regulation, sensory sensitivity, motivation, or anxiety. Qualitative feedback and trial participation indicated that Purrble was acceptable and feasible as a low-intensity waitlist adjunct.

Key findings

  • Of 39 enrolled participants, 37 were retained: 19 in the Purrble group and 18 in the control group.
  • A significant group-by-time interaction indicated greater reductions in depression symptoms with Purrble than with waitlist-as-usual.
  • No significant group-by-time interactions were found for emotion regulation, sensory sensitivity, motivation, or anxiety.
  • Motivation increased significantly within the Purrble group; qualitative feedback described sensory comfort, emotional connection, and barriers to use.

Why it matters

Waiting periods for outpatient eating disorder care may be a setting for low-intensity support. This feasibility trial suggests a socially assistive robot can be acceptable during that interval and provides preliminary evidence of a depression benefit. The findings also identify practical experiences and barriers relevant to evaluating such adjuncts in a larger, adequately powered study.

What to keep in mind

This was a feasibility trial with 37 retained participants and four weeks of intervention; the abstract reports no significant between-group interactions for most measured outcomes.

Source

Published in Eur Eat Disord Rev. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Psychiatry

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.