Prevalence of the use of protective equipment for ionizing radiation from fluoroscopy: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
J Med Imaging Radiat SciJun 29, 2026 (epub)
Sara Videira, Matilde A Rodrigues, Joana Santos et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the prevalence of protective equipment use among 15,014 healthcare workers exposed to ionizing radiation from fluoroscopy. The study found that 87% of participants consistently used lead aprons, while only 46% used thyroid shields and 17% used lead goggles. The analysis highlighted significant variations in equipment use based on the Human Development Index.
Key findings
- 87% of participants consistently used lead aprons (95% CI: 78-94).
- 46% consistently used thyroid shields (95% CI: 26-66).
- 17% consistently used lead goggles (95% CI: 8-29).
- Higher apron use was noted in countries with a very high Human Development Index.
Why it matters
Inconsistent use of protective equipment among healthcare workers can lead to increased occupational radiation exposure, potentially affecting long-term health. Understanding usage patterns can inform strategies to enhance safety protocols.