Liver Tumor Motion and Reconstructed Doses in a Clinical Trial of Respiratory-Gated Proton Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol PhysJul 1, 2026 (epub)

Saber Nankali, Esben Schjødt Worm, Jakob Borup Thomsen et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This prospective phase II clinical trial evaluated tumor motion and reconstructed delivered doses during respiratory-gated pencil beam scanning proton therapy in 16 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment was planned at exhale and delivered in 15 fractions. Mean tumor-position error during spot delivery was greatest in the cranio-caudal direction (2.9 ± 1.2 mm). Motion increased the clinical target volume homogeneity index by 4.1 ± 2.6 percentage points for individual fractions, but by 1.5 ± 2.1 percentage points when accumulated across analyzed fractions. Weekly control scans showed minimal dose variation from anatomic changes.

Key findings

  • Mean tumor-position errors during spot delivery were 1.1 ± 0.8 mm left-right, 2.9 ± 1.2 mm cranio-caudal, and 1.6 ± 0.7 mm anterior-posterior.
  • Motion increased the CTV homogeneity index by 4.1 ± 2.6 percentage points per fraction and 1.5 ± 2.1 percentage points across analyzed fractions.
  • Weekly control 4DCTs showed minimal CTV dose variation from interfractional anatomic changes.

Why it matters

Respiratory motion can alter proton dose distribution within a treatment fraction, even with exhale gating and image-guided setup. The smaller accumulated homogeneity-index change suggests that fractionation may reduce the overall impact of these motion-related interplay effects. The findings also indicate that, in this trial, anatomic changes between fractions had little effect on reconstructed CTV dose.

What to keep in mind

The study included 16 patients, and motion was measured or estimated at only 3-8 fractions per patient; delivered doses were reconstructed rather than directly measured.

Source

Published in Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.