A phase 1, randomized, open-label, single-dose relative bioavailability study of upper arm injection of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate comparing pharmacokinetics and hormone indicators of ovulation with anterior thigh and abdomen injection.

ContraceptionJul 2, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchObstetrics & Gynecology

Nancy Sherman, Sakambari Tripathy, Isabelle Huyghe et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This single-centre, randomized, open-label phase 1 relative bioavailability trial compared one 104 mg subcutaneous dose of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) injected into the upper arm with injection into the abdomen or anterior thigh. The study enrolled 67 healthy, pre-menopausal women aged 18 years or older. Upper-arm administration produced 42% greater MPA AUC and 24% greater C max than the reference sites, while Day 92 trough concentrations were similar (test/reference 95.17%; 90% CI: 73.80, 122.73). No successfully injected participant showed hormonal indications of ovulation after dosing, and no new safety findings were noted.

Key findings

  • MPA AUC was 42% greater and C max was 24% greater after upper-arm injection than after reference-site injection.
  • Day 92 trough concentrations were similar: test/reference 95.17%; 90% CI: 73.80, 122.73.
  • No successfully injected participant showed serum hormone indications of ovulation after drug administration.
  • No new adverse safety findings were noted in the upper-arm or reference groups.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that the upper arm may provide an additional administration site for DMPA-SC, with trough exposure and hormonal markers consistent with those observed at currently approved sites. This may broaden administration options, although the evidence comes from a single-dose study and does not establish outcomes with repeated use.

What to keep in mind

The trial was single-centre and assessed only one dose; the abstract reports pharmacokinetic and hormonal indicators rather than contraceptive outcomes during repeated use.

Source

Published in Contraception. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.