Balancing ovarian preservation and recurrence risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cystectomy versus ablative methods in endometrioma management.
P Romeo, A Tassone, L Bonanno et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated cystectomy versus ablative techniques for managing ovarian endometriomas in women. Cystectomy showed a trend toward lower recurrence risk (RR 0.61, p = 0.054), while ablative methods better preserved ovarian reserve, indicated by a smaller decline in antral follicle count (MD -1.96, p < 0.001).
Key findings
- Cystectomy showed a trend toward lower recurrence compared to ablative techniques (RR 0.61, p = 0.054).
- Ablative techniques resulted in a significantly smaller decline in antral follicle count (MD -1.96, p < 0.001).
- No significant differences were found in overall pregnancy rates (RR 1.02).
- No significant differences were observed in ART/IVF pregnancy rates (RR 0.83).
Why it matters
Understanding the trade-offs between cystectomy and ablative techniques is crucial for clinicians to tailor surgical management of ovarian endometriomas, balancing recurrence risk with ovarian reserve preservation and fertility outcomes.