An unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison of the efficacy of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory mantle-cell lymphoma.
Toby A Eyre, Leyla Mohseninejad, Lianne Barnieh et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This study conducted an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison to evaluate the efficacy of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle-cell lymphoma (R/R MCL). The analysis included individual patient data from zanubrutinib trials (n=118) and pooled data from ibrutinib trials (n=370). Results indicated that zanubrutinib significantly improved progression-free survival (HR=0.63) and overall survival (HR=0.46) compared to ibrutinib.
Key findings
- Zanubrutinib showed a hazard ratio of 0.63 for progression-free survival compared to ibrutinib.
- Overall survival was significantly better with zanubrutinib, with a hazard ratio of 0.46.
- Statistical significance was achieved with p-values of 0.0044 for progression-free survival and 0.0005 for overall survival.
Why it matters
Understanding the comparative efficacy of treatments for relapsed/refractory mantle-cell lymphoma is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. This study provides insights that may influence treatment decisions in clinical practice.