The effect of monetary versus point-based rewards on effort-cost decision making in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Schizophr ResJul 20, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchPsychiatryOpen access

Zachary Anderson, Victor Pokorny, Joshua Kenney et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized controlled trial examined the effects of monetary versus point-based rewards on effort-cost decision-making in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) and healthy controls. The study found that participants expended greater effort when rewarded with money (b = 0.13, p = 0.018), while negative symptom severity in CHR individuals was linked to reduced effort (b = -0.03, p = 0.016).

Key findings

  • Participants expended greater effort with money rewards compared to point-based rewards (b = 0.13, p = 0.018).
  • CHR individuals with higher negative symptom severity expended less effort (b = -0.03, p = 0.016).
  • No interaction was found between CHR status and reward type (b = 0.07, p = 0.845).
  • Higher household income correlated with less effort in high reward, high probability trials in the money condition (b = -0.24, p = 0.046).

Why it matters

Understanding how different reward types influence effort in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis can inform the design of behavioral assessments and interventions. This knowledge may enhance engagement and improve outcomes in clinical settings.

Source

Published in Schizophr Res. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Psychiatry

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.