To Investigate the Effect of Combined Use of 0.01% Atropine and 2% Carteolol Hydrochloride Eye Drops on Early-Onset Myopic Control in Western Chinese Children.

Ophthalmic EpidemiolJul 21, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOphthalmologyPediatrics

Qiwen Chen, Xinyu Peng, Jing Fang et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This study evaluated myopia progression in children aged 3–8 years in western China using 0.01% atropine alone or combined with 2% carteolol hydrochloride, compared with artificial tears. Although described as a randomized controlled trial, the 78 children were initially assigned to control or treatment according to parental willingness; only the treatment group was then randomly divided. At 6 months, the combination group had smaller increases in axial length (0.09 ± 0.10 mm) and less spherical-equivalent progression (-0.09 ± 0.12 D) than either comparator group. Adverse reaction rates were similar.

Key findings

  • At 6 months, axial-length increase was 0.09 ± 0.10 mm with combination treatment, 0.47 ± 0.18 mm with atropine, and 0.99 ± 0.16 mm with control (all p < 0.001).
  • Six-month spherical-equivalent progression was -0.09 ± 0.12 D with combination treatment, -0.51 ± 0.18 D with atropine, and -1.03 ± 0.15 D with control (all p < 0.001).
  • Intraocular pressure decreased by -1.75 ± 4.24 mmHg in the combination group and increased in the other groups.
  • Adverse reaction rates did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05).

Why it matters

Early-onset myopia can progress during childhood, and this study reports less refractive progression and axial elongation over 6 months with combined atropine and carteolol than with atropine alone or artificial tears. The findings also report comparable adverse reaction rates, while the observed intraocular-pressure change is relevant when interpreting a regimen that includes an IOP-lowering drug.

What to keep in mind

Follow-up was limited to 6 months. Initial assignment to control or treatment depended on parental willingness, so the overall comparison was not fully randomized.

Source

Published in Ophthalmic Epidemiol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Ophthalmology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.