A Phase I Dose-Escalation/Expansion Study of Fractionated-Dose and Multiple-Cycle Anti-PSMA-Targeted α-Emitter 225Ac-J591 in Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Clin Cancer ResOct 15, 2026
Clinical ResearchOncology (Medical)Nuclear MedicineOpen access

Scott T Tagawa, Charlene Thomas, Abdul Baseet Arham et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This phase I dose-escalation and expansion study evaluated fractionated and repeated-cycle 225Ac-J591 in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer resistant to androgen pathway modulation. The fractionated regimen was given on days 1 and 15, while the multiple-cycle regimen was repeated every 6 weeks for up to four cycles. Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities with fractionated dosing, and the recommended phase II dose was 60 KBq/kg twice. A prostate-specific antigen decline greater than 50% was the best response in 60% of patients across fractionated cohorts; repeated-cycle dosing was not recommended for further development.

Key findings

  • Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities with fractionated dosing; the recommended phase II dose was 60 KBq/kg twice.
  • Seven patients had dose-limiting toxicities in the multiple-cycle regimen, which was not recommended for further development.
  • A PSA decline greater than 50% was the best response in 60% of patients across fractionated cohorts, with or without prior 177Lu-PSMA.
  • Temporary hematologic toxicity was common: thrombocytopenia occurred in 93% (32% grade >3), neutropenia in 65% (13% grade ≥3), and anemia in 63% (20% grade ≥3).

Why it matters

The study provides early safety and activity data for PSMA-targeted alpha-emitter therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer, including some previously treated with 177Lu-PSMA. The contrast between the fractionated and repeated-cycle regimens is relevant to further clinical development, while the frequent hematologic adverse events underscore the need to assess toxicity alongside PSA responses.

What to keep in mind

This was a phase I study focused primarily on dose-limiting toxicity and dose selection; the abstract does not report a comparative efficacy assessment.

Source

Published in Clin Cancer Res. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.