Acceptance and commitment therapy for moral injury (ACT-MI) and present-centered therapy for moral injury (PCT-MI): Results from a randomized controlled pilot trial with war zone deployed veterans.
Lauren M Borges, Jacob K Farnsworth, Robyn D Walser et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This randomized controlled pilot trial evaluated Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Moral Injury (ACT-MI) and Present-Centered Therapy for Moral Injury (PCT-MI) among 74 war zone-deployed veterans. Both therapies were found acceptable, with ACT-MI showing a significant improvement in psychosocial functioning (M = -17.45) compared to PCT-MI (M = -5.89).
Key findings
- ACT-MI had a Client Satisfaction Questionnaire score of M = 29.52, indicating high acceptability.
- PCT-MI had a Client Satisfaction Questionnaire score of M = 26.41, also reflecting good acceptability.
- ACT-MI showed a greater reduction in psychosocial dysfunction (M = -17.45) compared to PCT-MI (M = -5.89).
Why it matters
Understanding the effectiveness and acceptability of these therapies is crucial for addressing moral injury in veterans, which can significantly impact their mental health and overall well-being.