Multicenter Phase I Study of Triapine in Combination with [177Lu]Lutetium-Dotatate in Patients with Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors (ETCTN 10388).

Clin Cancer ResOct 15, 2026

Aman Chauhan, Heidi L Weiss, Charles Kunos et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This multicenter phase I dose-escalation and dose-expansion study evaluated [177Lu]lutetium-dotatate plus oral triapine in patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Thirty-one patients received treatment; the selected recommended phase II dose was 200 mCi of [177Lu]lutetium-dotatate with triapine 150 mg on days 1–14. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 77% of patients, chiefly cytopenias. Among 28 evaluable patients, the objective response rate was 21.4%; median progression-free survival had not been reached at a median follow-up of 23.7 months.

Key findings

  • The recommended phase II regimen was [177Lu]lutetium-dotatate 200 mCi plus oral triapine 150 mg on days 1–14.
  • Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 77% of patients; lymphopenia (58%) and neutropenia (35%) were prominent.
  • Among 28 evaluable patients, the objective response rate was 21.4%; median progression-free survival was not reached at median follow-up of 23.7 months.
  • Nine patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities, including seven cases of grade 4 neutropenia.

Why it matters

The study provides early clinical evidence on combining a radiation sensitizer with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in well-differentiated GEP-NET. The response findings suggest preliminary antitumour activity, while the frequency of severe treatment-related events—particularly cytopenias—underscores the importance of safety monitoring. These phase I results can inform further evaluation but do not establish comparative benefit.

What to keep in mind

This was a phase I study with 31 treated patients; efficacy estimates were based on 28 evaluable patients, and the abstract reports no comparator group.

Source

Published in Clin Cancer Res. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.