Comparison of 2 Days of Moderate or High Carbohydrate Intake on Physical and Cognitive Performance in Female Team Sport Players During a Simulated Soccer Match Protocol.

Int J Sport Nutr Exerc MetabJul 28, 2026 (epub)

Laura McManus, Michael Scriney, Brendan Egan

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study compared two days of high versus moderate carbohydrate intake in 15 female field-based intermittent team-sport players completing a simulated soccer match protocol. High intake was 6 g/kg body mass/day and moderate intake 3 g/kg/day. Time to exhaustion did not differ significantly between conditions (HIGH, 295 ± 137 s; MOD, 288 ± 133 s; p = .852). However, sprint times were faster in later exercise blocks and perceived exertion was lower in early blocks with high intake; task-switching reaction time improved after exercise only in that condition.

Key findings

  • Time to exhaustion was similar with high and moderate carbohydrate intake: HIGH, 295 ± 137 s; MOD, 288 ± 133 s; p = .852.
  • Sprint times were faster with high intake in Blocks 3, 4, and 5 (p = .021, p = .035, and p < .001, respectively).
  • Perceived exertion was lower with high intake after Blocks 1 and 2 (p < .001 and p = .018, respectively).
  • Task-switching reaction time improved from pre- to postexercise with high intake (p = .017), but not moderate intake (p = .913).

Why it matters

The findings suggest that carbohydrate intake may influence selected aspects of simulated match performance and perceived effort in female team-sport players, even though it did not improve the primary endurance outcome of time to exhaustion. This adds population-specific evidence to a recommendation that has been less explored in female soccer players and highlights that performance effects may vary by outcome.

What to keep in mind

The study included 15 participants and assessed performance in a simulated match protocol rather than competitive matches.

Source

Published in Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Preventive Medicine / Public Health

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.