Barriers and facilitators to formal mental health help-seeking in individuals living with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review.

J Psychosom ResAug 7, 2026 (epub)

James Overs, Eliza Matas, Pragalathan Apputhurai et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review synthesised evidence on factors influencing formal mental health help-seeking among people living with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It included 19 studies involving 6,285 participants and used narrative synthesis across help-seeking orientation, intention and actual engagement. Engagement rates ranged from 21%-64% (weighted average: 37.15%). Health-related quality of life, IBD-related concerns, anxiety and depression were the psychosocial factors consistently and positively associated with help-seeking domains. Reported barriers covered sociodemographic, clinical, psychosocial, structural, systemic and treatment-related factors.

Key findings

  • Across 19 studies (N = 6285), formal mental health service engagement ranged from 21%-64% (weighted average: 37.15%).
  • Health-related quality of life, IBD-related concerns, anxiety and depression were consistently and positively associated with help-seeking domains.
  • Barriers included low perceived need, cost, lack of IBD-specific therapists, busy lifestyles, disease duration and stigma.

Why it matters

The review suggests that low uptake of mental health services in IBD may reflect a broad mix of personal, clinical and service-level obstacles, rather than a single barrier. Recognising this range can help inform research and the development of approaches to support access, while the review’s assessment of a fragmented evidence base cautions against assuming which factors are most influential.

What to keep in mind

The authors report significant methodological limitations and a fragmented, underdeveloped evidence base; included studies were assessed as having overall moderate quality.

Source

Published in J Psychosom Res. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Gastroenterology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.