Impact of palliative intervention on end-of-life outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for cancer.

SurgeryJul 16, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOncology (Medical)

Peter A Bryant, Caroline I Birdrow, Rameela Raman et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized controlled trial examined the impact of early palliative care on end-of-life outcomes in 235 patients undergoing curative surgery for abdominal cancer. The study found no significant differences in mortality or other end-of-life measures between those receiving palliative care and those receiving usual care, with a hazard ratio for mortality of 1.14 (95% CI, 0.85-1.51; P = .39).

Key findings

  • No significant difference in 3-year mortality between intervention and usual care groups (hazard ratio, 1.14; P = .39).
  • No significant difference in receipt of chemotherapy in the last 2 weeks of life (odds ratio, 5.19; P = .14).
  • No significant difference in hospice length of stay (odds ratio, 0.67; P = .38).
  • No significant difference in Family Assessment of Treatment at End of Life scores (odds ratio, 0.81; P = .65).

Why it matters

The findings suggest that early palliative care may not improve end-of-life outcomes for patients undergoing curative surgery for cancer, indicating a need for careful allocation of palliative resources in this population.

Source

Published in Surgery. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Clinical ResearchOncology (Medical)

Zamtocabtagene autoleucel, a tandem CD20-CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, for second line treatment of large B-cell lymphoma in patients ineligible for transplantation (DALY 2-EU): primary analysis of an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 2 study.

DALY 2-EU was an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 2 trial comparing tandem CD20-CD19-directed zamtocabtagene autoleucel (zamto-cel) with R-GemOx in adults with second-line relapsed or refractory large B-cell…

Lancet OncolOct 27, 2026Read summary
Clinical ResearchOncology (Medical)

Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and chemotherapy versus standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (UNION): a prespecified interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

UNION was a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial at nine hospitals in China comparing neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab plus CAPOX with long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by…

Lancet OncolOct 25, 2026Read summary
Clinical ResearchHematology

Efficacy and safety of mitapivat in patients with sickle cell disease (RISE UP): a phase 3, double-blind, global, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

RISE UP was a phase 3, double-blind, global, randomised, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 69 sites in 15 countries. It evaluated twice-daily mitapivat in patients older than 16 years with sickle cell disease…

LancetOct 24, 2026Read summary

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.