Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Moderately Hypofractionated IMRT for Localized Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Rodney J Ellis, Stephanie L Pugh, James B Yu et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This phase-3 randomized clinical trial compared stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to moderately hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (MH-IMRT) in patients with localized intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Among 698 participants, SBRT showed fewer bowel-related minimal clinically important declines (34.9% vs 43.8%, P = .03) but did not demonstrate superior disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years (88.6% for SBRT vs 92.1% for MH-IMRT, P < .001).
Key findings
- Fewer grade 3 + 4 genitourinary adverse events occurred in the SBRT group (0.6% vs 2.5%, P = .04).
- At 2 years, no significant difference in urinary irritative domain (35.4% vs 33.7%, P = .68).
- SBRT resulted in significantly fewer MCIDs in the bowel domain (34.9% vs 43.8%, P = .03).
- At 3 years, DFS was 88.6% for SBRT vs 92.1% for MH-IMRT (P < .001).
Why it matters
Understanding the comparative effectiveness of SBRT and MH-IMRT is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies in localized prostate cancer, particularly regarding quality of life and disease control.