Comparison of the outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Phuong Minh Tang, Bui Thien Nghiep Vo, Tung-Cheng Chang et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) versus ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in 4700 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. IPAA was linked to a significantly lower risk of postoperative rectal and pouch-anal cancer (RR, 0.22) but a higher risk of desmoid tumors (RR, 1.58) and worse bowel function.
Key findings
- IPAA was associated with a lower risk of postoperative rectal and pouch-anal cancer (RR, 0.22).
- Patients undergoing IPAA had a higher risk of desmoid tumors (RR, 1.58).
- IPAA resulted in higher rates of 24-hour incontinence (RR, 1.90) and stool frequency (MD, 1.89 stools/d).
- Anastomotic stricture occurred more frequently after IPAA (RR, 2.91).
Why it matters
Understanding the trade-offs between IPAA and IRA is crucial for clinicians in making informed decisions regarding surgical options for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, balancing oncologic outcomes with functional implications.