Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Turbinate Surgery for Chronic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Clin OtolaryngolAug 14, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOtolaryngology (ENT)
Do Hyun Kim, David W Jang, Se Hwan Hwang
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of various turbinate surgeries for chronic rhinitis. The analysis included six surgical interventions and found that microdebrider-assisted turbinoplasty (MAT) yielded better outcomes overall, despite a higher risk of mucosal tearing. Other techniques showed varying effectiveness and adverse effects.
Key findings
- MAT showed better outcomes across most parameters but had a higher risk of mucosal tearing.
- SMD was less effective in alleviating nasal obstruction at 6-12 months.
- RFVTR had the shortest operative time and minimized nasal dryness.
- Laser ablation increased the risk of atrophic rhinitis.
Why it matters
Understanding the comparative efficacy and safety of turbinate surgeries can guide clinicians in selecting appropriate interventions for patients with chronic rhinitis, potentially improving patient outcomes and minimizing adverse effects.