Imaging-based prevalence of the peroneus quartus muscle and its association with peroneal tendon pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Skeletal RadiolAug 18, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchRadiology (Diagnostic)Orthopedic SurgeryOpen access

Luiza Borba de Almeida Madruga, Pandora Eloa Oliveira Fonseca, Giovanna Macanhã Scremin et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed imaging-based prevalence of the peroneus quartus muscle and its relationship to peroneal tendon pathology. Across 17 studies and 3,725 ankle imaging examinations, pooled prevalence was 11% (95% CI: 8-15%), with substantial heterogeneity. In three studies comparing ankles with and without the variant, its presence was associated with higher odds of peroneal tendon tears (pooled odds ratio 3.40, 95% CI: 2.03-5.68; I² = 0%; p < 0.001). The authors note that this association does not establish causation.

Key findings

  • The peroneus quartus prevalence was 11% (95% CI: 8-15%) across 3,725 ankle imaging examinations.
  • Peroneal tendon pathology was present in 51.4% (95% CI: 41.9-60.8%) of positive ankles across six studies.
  • Presence of the peroneus quartus was associated with higher odds of tendon tears: pooled odds ratio 3.40, 95% CI: 2.03-5.68; I² = 0%; p < 0.001.

Why it matters

The findings indicate that this anatomical variant is not uncommon on ankle imaging and may coexist with peroneal tendon disease. Recognising the association can inform interpretation of imaging and consideration of local tendon anatomy, while the evidence does not show that the variant causes tears.

What to keep in mind

Prevalence estimates showed substantial heterogeneity (I² = 80.5%). The tear association was based on only three studies, and the observational evidence cannot establish causality.

Source

Published in Skeletal Radiol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Radiology (Diagnostic)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.