The Role of Vitamin D in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review of Human and Animal Studies.

Ann Plast SurgAug 18, 2026 (epub)

Afnan M Nour, Adam Boukind, Lillee Izadi et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review examined human and animal evidence on preoperative and perioperative vitamin D levels and outcomes in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Fifteen studies were included: 11 human and 4 animal studies. Lower preoperative vitamin D levels were consistently associated with poorer wound healing, including hypertrophic scarring, keloids, and surgical complications. Animal studies found improved flap survival with supplementation, while evidence for nerve regeneration was mainly preclinical. The review identifies vitamin D as a potential biomarker and therapeutic agent, but concludes that further high-quality research is needed before definitive assessment or supplementation guidance can be established.

Key findings

  • The review included 15 studies: 11 human studies and 4 animal studies.
  • Lower preoperative vitamin D levels were consistently associated with poorer wound healing, hypertrophic scarring, keloid formation, and surgical complications.
  • In animal studies, vitamin D supplementation improved flap survival, with findings linked to enhanced angiogenesis and reduced inflammation.
  • Evidence for nerve-regenerative benefits depended predominantly on preclinical studies.

Why it matters

Vitamin D status may be relevant to wound healing and other outcomes in plastic and reconstructive surgery, and could potentially serve as a biomarker or therapeutic target. However, the evidence combines human and animal studies and is not sufficient to establish definitive assessment or supplementation guidance. Distinguishing the more consistent wound-healing associations from predominantly preclinical findings is important when interpreting possible clinical implications.

What to keep in mind

The review reports small sample sizes, heterogeneous populations, and inconsistent vitamin D measurement methods. Evidence for nerve regeneration relied predominantly on preclinical studies.

Source

Published in Ann Plast Surg. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Plastic Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.