Prophylactic Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ann Surg OncolAug 20, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOncology (Medical)General SurgeryOpen access

Yi-Chang Chen, Sheng-Chi Chang, Yuan-Yao Tsai et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for locally advanced colorectal cancer. It pooled data from nine studies involving 2023 patients: 553 received prophylactic HIPEC and 1470 were controls. HIPEC was associated with better peritoneal metastasis-free survival at one, three, and five years and better disease-free survival at three and five years. For three-year peritoneal metastasis-free survival, the hazard ratio was 0.333 (95% CI [0.152-0.731], P = 0.006). Overall survival and reported postoperative complications did not differ significantly between groups.

Key findings

  • Peritoneal metastasis-free survival favored HIPEC at one year (HR 0.521, 95% CI [0.292-0.930], P = 0.028), three years (HR 0.333, 95% CI [0.152-0.731], P = 0.006), and five years (HR 0.334, 95% CI [0.125-0.887], P < 0.028).
  • Disease-free survival favored HIPEC at three years (HR 0.701, 95% CI [0.574-0.855], P < 0.001) and five years (HR 0.714, 95% CI [0.590-0.864], P = 0.001).
  • There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival, postoperative major complications, leakage, or surgical site complications.

Why it matters

Preventing peritoneal metastasis is a relevant goal in locally advanced colorectal cancer, and the pooled findings suggest prophylactic HIPEC may improve peritoneal metastasis-free and disease-free survival. The absence of a significant overall-survival difference means the reported disease-control benefits should not be assumed to translate into longer survival. The results may inform evaluation of this approach but do not establish its benefit conclusively.

What to keep in mind

The meta-analysis included nine studies, and the authors advise caution, calling for confirmation in future high-quality randomized studies and collaborative individual patient data meta-analyses.

Source

Published in Ann Surg Oncol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.