Open Dialogue versus treatment as usual for adults presenting in crisis to mental health services in England (the ODDESSI Trial): a multisite cluster-randomised trial.
Stephen Pilling, Thomas Craig, Katherine Clarke et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
The ODDESSI Trial, a multicenter cluster-randomised trial, evaluated the effectiveness of Open Dialogue versus treatment as usual for adults in crisis within mental health services in England. Among 494 participants, there was no significant difference in time to relapse after recovery (marginal hazard ratio 0.95). However, Open Dialogue showed lower rates of psychiatric admissions and improved self-rated recovery and satisfaction.
Key findings
- No significant difference in time to relapse between Open Dialogue and treatment as usual (marginal hazard ratio 0.95).
- Open Dialogue was associated with lower probabilities of psychiatric inpatient admission.
- Participants in Open Dialogue reported better health-related quality of life and satisfaction with services.
Why it matters
This study highlights the potential benefits of Open Dialogue in reducing hospital admissions and improving patient-reported outcomes, suggesting a need for further exploration of person-centered approaches in mental health care.