Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Modified-FOLFOXIRI Plus Cetuximab Versus Bevacizumab in RAS / BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Final Analysis of the DEEPER Trial.

J Clin OncolAug 27, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOncology (Medical)

Yu Sunakawa, Manabu Shiozawa, Takanori Watanabe et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

The randomized phase II DEEPER trial compared m-FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab with m-FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, reporting final survival outcomes and exploratory subgroup analyses. Overall, progression-free and overall survival did not differ in the per-protocol population. Among patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type, left-sided tumors, median progression-free survival was 14.8 months with cetuximab versus 11.9 months with bevacizumab (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.97; P = .029). Overall survival in this subgroup numerically favored cetuximab but was not statistically conclusive.

Key findings

  • In the per-protocol population, progression-free and overall survival did not differ between treatment groups.
  • For RAS/BRAF wild-type, left-sided tumors, median progression-free survival was 14.8 v 11.9 months (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.97]; P = .029) with cetuximab versus bevacizumab.
  • In the same subgroup, median overall survival was 50.2 months with cetuximab and 40.2 months with bevacizumab (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.05]).
  • Exploratory analyses associated cetuximab-based therapy with longer overall survival in male patients (HR, 0.59; P = .016) and patients with extrahepatic disease (HR, 0.60; P = .014).

Why it matters

The overall survival analysis did not show a difference across the per-protocol population, while the left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type subgroup had longer progression-free survival with cetuximab. These results help frame the potential relevance of tumor molecular and sidedness characteristics when interpreting first-line regimen comparisons, while the exploratory subgroup signals require cautious interpretation.

What to keep in mind

The reported subgroup analyses were exploratory, and the overall survival estimate in the RAS/BRAF wild-type, left-sided subgroup was imprecise, with a 95% CI crossing 1.

Source

Published in J Clin Oncol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.