Clinical Outcomes of Index Needle Revision for Failed Deep Sclerectomy in Vietnamese Eyes.

Clin TerJan 1, 2026
Clinical ResearchOphthalmology

Nguyen Thi Thuy Giang, Bui Thi Van Anh, Pham Trong Van

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This prospective study assessed first-time needle revision augmented with subconjunctival 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for failed non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) in Vietnamese patients. It included 41 eyes of 33 patients. Mean intraocular pressure fell from 27.66 ± 6.84 mmHg before revision to 14.10 ± 3.72 mmHg at 12 months (p < 0.001), while visual acuity changed minimally. At 12 months, complete and qualified success rates were 68.3% and 70.7%, respectively. Complications occurred, most commonly subconjunctival hemorrhage; no endophthalmitis was observed.

Key findings

  • Mean intraocular pressure decreased from 27.66 ± 6.84 mmHg before revision to 14.10 ± 3.72 mmHg at 12 months (p < 0.001).
  • At 12 months, complete success was 68.3% and qualified success was 70.7%.
  • Subconjunctival hemorrhage occurred in 33 eyes (80.5%); hypotony occurred in 4 eyes (9.8%), all complications being reported in eyes with prior mitomycin C exposure.
  • Best-corrected visual acuity changed minimally, from 0.67 ± 0.76 preoperatively to 0.65 ± 0.77 at 12 months.

Why it matters

Failed NPDS can leave intraocular pressure inadequately controlled. These findings suggest that 5-FU-augmented needle revision may restore bleb function and lower pressure over 12 months in this patient group, while also documenting postoperative complications relevant to procedural risk assessment. The reported caution around thin, avascular blebs is pertinent because hypotony was among the observed complications.

What to keep in mind

The prospective study included 41 eyes from 33 patients, and follow-up outcomes were reported through 12 months. The abstract does not describe a comparison group.

Source

Published in Clin Ter. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Ophthalmology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.