Voretigene Neparvovec (Luxturna) for Biallelic RPE65-Associated Retinal Dystrophy: Systematic Review.

Am J OphthalmolAug 31, 2026 (epub)

Abu Bakar Butt, Michele Zaman, Andrew Mihalache et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review synthesized randomized and observational studies of voretigene neparvovec in people with biallelic RPE65-associated inherited retinal disorders. Across 28 studies involving 376 individuals and 673 treated eyes, visual acuity gains were variable and generally modest, while light sensitivity improved consistently and visual-field gains were reported, particularly in the pivotal trial cohort. A random-effects meta-analysis of three studies estimated new or progressive perifoveal atrophy in 75% of treated eyes (95% CI, 57%-89%). Chorioretinal atrophy and intraocular inflammation were the most frequently reported adverse events.

Key findings

  • Across three studies, pooled incidence of new or progressive perifoveal atrophy was 75% of treated eyes (95% CI, 57%-89%).
  • In the largest cohort, full-field stimulus threshold improved by a mean of -18.24 dB, evident at 1 month and sustained through 6 months.
  • The pivotal trial cohort had a 92% mean visual-field increase at 1 year, sustained to 3-4 years.
  • BCVA outcomes were variable and generally modest, with somewhat greater gains in pediatric than adult cohorts.

Why it matters

The review highlights that treatment effects differ across visual outcomes: functional gains in light sensitivity and visual field may occur even when BCVA changes are limited. It also identifies perifoveal atrophy as a frequent structural finding, underscoring the importance of considering both functional benefit and retinal changes when counseling about treatment and interpreting follow-up.

What to keep in mind

The review combined randomized and observational studies, and findings were synthesized narratively except where data allowed meta-analysis; results varied across cohorts and outcomes.

Source

Published in Am J Ophthalmol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Ophthalmology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.