'Posterior (SMA-first) Approach' Versus 'Standard Approach' in Terms of Resection Margin and Long-Term Survival After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Randomized Trial.
Hemant Ashok Jain, Gursagar Singh Sahota, Anand Narayan Singh et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This randomized controlled trial compared the SMA-first approach to the standard approach in pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer. Among 183 analyzed patients, both techniques yielded similar R0 resection rates (82.2% vs 78.5%, p = 0.53) and long-term survival outcomes, with median overall survival of 53 months for SMA-first and 51 months for the standard approach.
Key findings
- R0 resection rates were similar: 82.2% for SMA-first vs 78.5% for standard approach (p = 0.53).
- Median overall survival was comparable: 53 months for SMA-first vs 51 months for standard approach (p = 0.69).
- Blood loss was significantly higher in the SMA-first group: 675 ml vs 600 ml (p = 0.02).
- Complication rates were similar between both groups, including ISGPS Grade B/C leaks and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complications.
Why it matters
Understanding the effectiveness of different surgical approaches in pancreaticoduodenectomy is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. This study suggests that the SMA-first approach does not provide significant advantages over the standard approach in terms of resection margins or survival.