Surgical outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surg OncolSep 4, 2026 (epub)

Phuong Minh Tang, Bui Thien Nghiep Vo, El-Wui Loh et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed surgical outcomes for appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, drawing on 43 observational cohort studies involving 12,014 patients. For localized disease, recurrence was 1.4% after appendectomy and 2.3% after right hemicolectomy. Among patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC, five-year overall survival varied by histology: 94.2% for acellular mucin, 78.1% for low-grade disease, and 47.4% for high-grade disease. High-grade histology and incomplete cytoreduction were associated with worse survival; the authors caution that certainty is low or very low.

Key findings

  • Localized disease recurrence was 1.4% after appendectomy and 2.3% after right hemicolectomy.
  • After CRS + HIPEC, five-year overall survival was 94.2%, 78.1%, and 47.4% for acellular mucin, low-grade, and high-grade cohorts, respectively.
  • High-grade disease was associated with worse overall survival (HR, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.88-5.41) and disease-free survival (HR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.68-5.58).
  • Incomplete cytoreduction was associated with worse overall survival (HR, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.54-7.45).

Why it matters

The findings show that outcomes differ substantially by histologic grade and completeness of cytoreduction, while recurrence after resection of localized disease was low in the pooled cohorts. These estimates can help frame discussions of prognosis and follow-up, but the evidence base is observational and the review rates certainty as low or very low, limiting confidence in comparisons between surgical approaches.

What to keep in mind

All 43 included studies were observational cohorts; the authors report low or very low certainty, limiting confidence in pooled estimates and comparisons between surgical approaches.

Source

Published in Surg Oncol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in General Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.