AINAR trial: A randomized controlled trial to assess the usefulness of artificial intelligence-based game to conquer needle fear in blood donors.

Transfus Clin BiolSep 7, 2026 (epub)

Radheshyam Meher, Gopal K Patidar

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This single-centre, parallel-group randomized controlled trial at AIIMS, New Delhi, assessed whether an artificial intelligence-based game played during needle insertion and removal could reduce needle fear and immediate vasovagal reactions (VVR) in whole blood donors. Among 3000 randomized donors, VVR occurred in 1.8% of controls and 1.13% of the AINAR group (relative risk 0.63); this reduction was not statistically significant. Donor-reported needle fear decreased in both groups, with a greater reduction in the AINAR group. Higher pre-donation and persistent post-donation fear were associated with VVR.

Key findings

  • VVR incidence was 1.8% with control and 1.13% with AINAR (relative risk 0.63), a reduction that was not statistically significant.
  • Needle fear decreased after donation in both groups, with a greater reduction in the AINAR group.
  • Moderate-to-severe pre-donation fear was associated with VVR (5.6 vs. 1.3%, P<0.001).
  • Persistent post-donation fear was associated with VVR (aOR 9.19, 95% CI 3.19-26.48); prior VVR was also independently associated (aOR 4.65, 95% CI 1.15-18.82).

Why it matters

Needle fear is relevant to donor experience and may identify donors at higher risk of VVR. This trial suggests an AI-based game can reduce reported fear, but it did not establish a statistically significant reduction in immediate VVR. The distinction between improving a reported experience and preventing a clinical reaction is important when interpreting behavioural interventions.

What to keep in mind

The trial was conducted at a single centre. The reduction in VVR did not reach statistical significance, and the authors state that larger multicentre studies are needed.

Source

Published in Transfus Clin Biol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Preventive Medicine / Public Health

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.