Compliance With Ecological Momentary Assessment Among Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Guiyuan Ma, Cai Deng, Zitong Zhang et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated compliance with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) among 13,565 cancer patients. The study found a pooled compliance rate of 78.55% (95% CI 73.48%-82.87%), indicating that EMA can be effectively utilized in oncology research, though compliance varies significantly across contexts.
Key findings
- The pooled compliance rate for EMA among cancer patients was 78.55% (95% CI 73.48%-82.87%).
- A prediction interval of 48.59%-93.41% indicates substantial variability in compliance rates.
- Only 2 out of 23 studies were assessed as low risk of bias.
- The certainty of evidence for the pooled compliance rate was rated as very low.
Why it matters
Understanding compliance rates with EMA can enhance the design of studies in oncology, allowing for more accurate real-time assessments of patients' psychological states. This knowledge can inform future research methodologies and improve patient engagement.
What to keep in mind
The certainty of evidence was rated as very low, and there was high heterogeneity in compliance rates across studies.