Sleep duration and compliance with sleep recommendations among Brazilian children and adolescents: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Pediatr (Rio J)Sep 16, 2026 (epub)

Gabriel Pereira Maciel, Ricardo de Camargo, Maria Beatriz Vieira de Brito et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This updated systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis pooled observational evidence on sleep duration and adherence to sleep recommendations among Brazilian children and adolescents aged 0–18 years. Across 84 studies involving 177,074 participants, adequate sleep was estimated in 45% (95% CI, 29-62%) of preschoolers, 65% (95% CI, 55-74%) of school-age children, and 47% (95% CI, 40-55%) of adolescents. Mean sleep duration declined with age, from 10.50 h (95%CI, 9.85-11.20) in preschoolers to 7.77 h (95%CI, 7.42-8.12) in adolescents. Estimates varied by measurement method and guideline.

Key findings

  • Adequate sleep duration was estimated in 45% (95% CI, 29-62%) of preschoolers, 65% (95% CI, 55-74%) of school-age children, and 47% (95% CI, 40-55%) of adolescents.
  • Mean sleep duration decreased with age, from 10.50 h (95%CI, 9.85-11.20) in preschoolers to 7.77 h (95%CI, 7.42-8.12) in adolescents.
  • Questionnaire-based measures produced higher estimates than accelerometry, and prevalence differed according to the sleep guideline used.
  • Heterogeneity was substantial across analyses (I² > 98%).

Why it matters

The pooled estimates indicate that many Brazilian children and adolescents may not meet recommended sleep durations, a concern the authors link to health and development. Differences by measurement method and guideline complicate comparisons between studies and interpretation of prevalence. More consistent assessment and reporting could improve epidemiological surveillance and inform public health planning.

What to keep in mind

Substantial between-study heterogeneity (I² > 98%) limits confidence in the pooled estimates; results also varied by measurement method and sleep guideline.

Source

Published in J Pediatr (Rio J). This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pediatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.