Comparative analysis of robotic- and endoscopic-assisted minimally invasive nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: a meta-analysis with subgroup analyses.
Xiaohan Wang, Hua Tian, Min Zhang et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This meta-analysis compared perioperative and oncologic outcomes of robotic- and endoscopic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) versus conventional open NSM in breast cancer patients. The analysis included twelve studies and found that minimally invasive approaches had longer operative times but resulted in less blood loss and shorter reconstruction times. Overall complication rates were lower in the minimally invasive group.
Key findings
- Minimally invasive NSM had less blood loss compared to open NSM.
- Operative time was longer for minimally invasive techniques.
- Minimally invasive approaches showed lower rates of overall complications.
- No significant differences in long-term oncologic outcomes or aesthetic benefits were found.
Why it matters
Understanding the comparative outcomes of minimally invasive techniques versus traditional approaches can inform surgical decision-making and patient management in breast cancer treatment, potentially leading to improved recovery and reduced complications.