Comparing long-term weight loss and complications in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gabriel LaPlante, Sunpreet Cheema, Brianna Brand et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This systematic review and meta-analysis compared long-term outcomes of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in 7442 patients. ESG was associated with lower total body weight loss at 6, 12, and 24 months, but also a significantly lower risk of overall adverse events and de novo gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD).
Key findings
- ESG resulted in lower total body weight loss at 6 months (-8.34%) compared to LSG.
- At 12 months, ESG showed a mean difference in total body weight loss of -12.58%.
- ESG had a reduced risk of overall adverse events (RR 0.54) compared to LSG.
- The risk of de novo GERD was significantly lower in the ESG group (RR 0.33).
Why it matters
Understanding the comparative outcomes of ESG and LSG is crucial for clinicians in guiding patients towards appropriate bariatric options, especially for those concerned about surgical risks or pre-existing GERD.