Testosterone monitoring and supplementation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer treated with 6-36 months of androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy: a systematic literature review.

Radiother OncolSep 12, 2026 (epub)

Vérane Achard, Almudena Zapatero, Amar U Kishan et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic literature review examined testosterone monitoring, recovery, and replacement therapy in patients with intermediate- or high-risk localised prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and curative-intent radiotherapy. It included 29 studies. Baseline testosterone was not associated with oncological outcomes, while on-treatment suppression to < 20 ng/dL (<0.7 nmol/L), rather than the conventional 50 ng/dL (<1.7 nmol/L) threshold, was associated with improved oncologic outcomes. Testosterone recovery varied with ADT duration and patient and treatment factors. Evidence on testosterone replacement after curative treatment was very limited, particularly for high-risk patients treated with ADT and radiotherapy.

Key findings

  • Baseline testosterone was not associated with oncological outcomes but strongly predicted testosterone recovery after treatment.
  • On-treatment testosterone < 20 ng/dL (<0.7 nmol/L), rather than the conventional 50 ng/dL (<1.7 nmol/L) threshold, was associated with improved oncologic outcomes.
  • Non-castrate testosterone levels were typically reached within 6-15 months; full eugonadal recovery often took years and remained incomplete in a substantial proportion.
  • Limited observational evidence suggested testosterone replacement after curative treatment did not increase recurrence risk, but evidence in high-risk patients receiving ADT and radiotherapy was sparse.

Why it matters

Testosterone levels may help characterise treatment response and anticipate recovery after ADT, which can be prolonged or incomplete. The review also highlights that evidence about testosterone replacement in this setting is insufficient for confident conclusions, especially for high-risk disease. These uncertainties matter when interpreting testosterone results and discussing persistent hypogonadal symptoms after curative treatment.

What to keep in mind

Evidence for testosterone replacement was very limited and observational, with sparse data in high-risk patients treated with ADT and radiotherapy.

Source

Published in Radiother Oncol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Urology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.