Teaching Acute Coronary Syndrome High-Risk ECG Interpretation and Clinical Decision-Making Through FOAMed Videos and Podcast Versus Print-Based Materials Among Emergency Care Providers: Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial.
JMIR Med EducSep 15, 2026 (epub)
Wiebke Turner, Klaus Fessele, Martin Fandler et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of FOAMed videos and podcasts versus print materials for teaching high-risk acute coronary syndrome (ACS) ECG interpretation among emergency care providers in Germany. The FOAMed group showed significant improvements in ECG interpretation accuracy (from 55% to 65.5%) and clinical decision-making (from 45% to 68%), compared to the print group, which had smaller gains.
Key findings
- ECG interpretation accuracy improved from 55% to 65.5% in the FOAMed group.
- Text-based ACS clinical decision-making increased from 45% to 68% in the FOAMed group.
- The print-based group showed smaller improvements in ECG interpretation and decision-making.
- Qualitative feedback indicated higher perceived clarity and engagement with FOAMed resources.
Why it matters
Improving ECG interpretation and clinical decision-making in emergency care is crucial for timely diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Enhanced educational methods may lead to better patient outcomes in critical situations.