The role of stimulus-induced skin conductance in disorder of consciousness: A systematic review.

Neurosci Biobehav RevSep 15, 2026 (epub)

Davide Cardile, Chiara Arena, Francesco Corallo et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review assessed studies using sensory stimulation and skin conductance (SC) recordings in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC). Nine studies included 134 patients with coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, or minimally conscious state. All used auditory stimulation, while three also used tactile, olfactory, or multisensory stimuli. Emotionally salient or personally relevant stimuli tended to produce stronger SC responses than neutral stimuli, though patient responses were often delayed, attenuated, or inconsistent relative to healthy controls. The review concludes that SC may complement behavioural assessment but should not be used as a standalone diagnostic marker.

Key findings

  • The review included nine studies and 134 patients with coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, or minimally conscious state.
  • All nine studies used auditory stimulation; three also included tactile, olfactory, or multisensory stimulation.
  • Emotionally salient or personally relevant stimuli tended to elicit stronger SC responses than neutral stimuli, but patient responses were often delayed, attenuated, or inconsistent compared with healthy controls.

Why it matters

Behavioural tools alone can make assessment of DoC challenging. SC offers a motor-independent measure of autonomic arousal that may reveal responses not readily captured by observable behaviour. Differentiation between emotional and neutral stimuli may indicate residual autonomic and salience-related processing, supporting further evaluation of SC as one component of multimodal assessment.

What to keep in mind

The evidence comes from only nine studies with heterogeneous stimulation protocols, limiting comparability. Patient responses were also inconsistent, and the review does not establish SC as a standalone diagnostic marker.

Source

Published in Neurosci Biobehav Rev. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Neurology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.