Association between the rs2228570 polymorphism of the vitamin D receptor gene and serum vitamin D levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Nutr BiochemSep 15, 2026 (epub)

María Benavent, Francisco Félix Caballero, Cristina Álvarez-Martín et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether the vitamin D receptor rs2228570 (FokI) polymorphism is associated with circulating 25(OH)D in healthy adults. Of 66 eligible articles, 45 studies contributed data from 15,256 participants, mainly from Europe, Asia, and America; the studies were cross-sectional or case-control. No significant association was found in the overall analyses across the genetic models examined. An American subgroup showed an association for CT versus TT (P=.04), while higher levels among C-allele carriers in Fair-quality studies were accompanied by substantial heterogeneity.

Key findings

  • Across 15,256 participants, no significant association between rs2228570 and 25(OH)D was observed in any overall genetic model.
  • The American subgroup showed an association for CT versus TT (P=.04); other continent-based subgroup analyses were not significant (P>.05).
  • Fair-quality studies reported higher 25(OH)D among C-allele carriers, with substantial heterogeneity (I² range: 81.4-95.1%).

Why it matters

The pooled findings do not support a consistent relationship between this common VDR polymorphism and circulating 25(OH)D in the studied healthy-adult populations. This helps frame genetic variation as only one possible contributor to vitamin D status and underscores that subgroup signals should be interpreted cautiously when results are heterogeneous.

What to keep in mind

The included evidence came from cross-sectional and case-control studies, and substantial heterogeneity was reported in Fair-quality-study comparisons. The eligible population excluded pregnant or lactating women, people with obesity, and supplement users.

Source

Published in J Nutr Biochem. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Endocrinology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.