Comparison of Postoperative Pain Following Modified Radical Mastectomy under Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia versus General Anesthesia: A Randomized Control Trial.

Ann Afr MedNov 27, 2025 (epub)

Nitu Puthenveettil, Sundeep Vijayaraghavan, Sunil Rajan et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized controlled trial compared thoracic epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask airway in 100 patients undergoing unilateral modified radical mastectomy. Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower with epidural anesthesia at all measured time points, and analgesic requirements were significantly higher with general anesthesia (P < 0.001). Hospital stay and intraoperative hemodynamics were comparable. Patients reported greater satisfaction with general anesthesia, while several airway-related symptoms and nausea and vomiting were more frequent in that group.

Key findings

  • Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower with thoracic epidural anesthesia at all measured time points.
  • Perioperative analgesic requirements were significantly higher with general anesthesia (P < 0.001).
  • Patient satisfaction was significantly higher with general anesthesia, although surgeons were satisfied with both approaches.
  • Sore throat, cough, hoarseness, nausea and vomiting, and ICU stay were reported as significantly higher in the general-anesthesia group.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that anesthetic approach may affect postoperative analgesia and recovery symptoms after modified radical mastectomy, while patient satisfaction may favor general anesthesia. Considering these differing outcomes can support informed discussion of anesthesia options, but the abstract does not establish that one approach is preferable overall.

What to keep in mind

The trial included 100 patients undergoing unilateral modified radical mastectomy; the abstract provides no effect sizes for pain or other outcomes, and does not report follow-up beyond the perioperative period.

Source

Published in Ann Afr Med. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in General Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.