Structural Brain Correlates of Bulimia Nervosa Diagnosis and Symptom Severity: A Coordinated ENIGMA Eating Disorders Working Group Analysis.

JAMA PsychiatryNov 1, 2026
Clinical ResearchPsychiatryRadiology (Diagnostic)Open access

Laura A Berner, Anusha Phadnis, Margaret L Westwater et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This coordinated, international case-control meta-analysis examined structural MRI correlates of bulimia nervosa (BN) diagnosis and symptom severity across 17 cohorts at 13 sites. The sample comprised 369 females with BN and 417 healthy female controls. Compared with controls, participants with BN had lower nucleus accumbens volume (Cohen d, -0.20; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.06) and lower surface area in the superior and transverse temporal cortices; cortical thickness did not differ significantly. Greater binge-eating frequency was associated with lower surface area in several regions, whereas total compensatory behaviors were not associated with anatomical measures.

Key findings

  • BN was associated with lower nucleus accumbens volume (Cohen d, -0.20; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.06).
  • Cortical surface area was lower in the superior temporal (d, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.41 to -0.12) and transverse temporal cortices (d, -0.24; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.10) in BN.
  • Binge-eating frequency correlated with lower surface area across several regions (r value range, -0.20 to -0.14), but not with cortical thickness or subcortical volume.
  • No anatomical characteristics were associated with total compensatory behaviors; no significant group differences in cortical thickness were observed.

Why it matters

The findings identify modest, localized structural differences associated with BN and binge-eating frequency across a large, coordinated international sample. Their distribution is consistent with involvement of reward, cognitive control, interoceptive, and social cognition circuits, offering evidence to inform neurobiological models of a disorder whose brain basis remains poorly characterized.

What to keep in mind

The case-control design identifies associations and cannot establish that the structural differences cause BN or its symptoms. All participants were female, limiting generalizability to males.

Source

Published in JAMA Psychiatry. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Psychiatry

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.