Pre-operative neural substrates of deep brain stimulation outcomes: A systematic review and cross-disorder network synthesis.

Neurosci Biobehav RevSep 17, 2026 (epub)

Yutong Bai, Tiffany A Rodrigues, Andrew Z Yang et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and cross-disorder network synthesis examined whether pre-operative neuroimaging features are associated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) outcomes. It included 53 studies involving 1758 patients, predominantly with movement disorders, especially Parkinson’s disease, or psychiatric disorders, mainly major depressive disorder. Disease-specific frequency maps and normative connectivity analyses identified distinct central regions and circuit patterns: motor and basal ganglia networks in Parkinson’s disease, and amygdala and limbic networks in major depressive disorder. Both disorders also showed engagement of shared higher-order networks. The authors conclude that pre-operative circuit organization is associated with outcomes, while noting that proposed imaging-informed patient selection requires further validation.

Key findings

  • The review included 53 studies and 1758 patients; movement disorders accounted for 73.6% and psychiatric disorders for 20.8%.
  • In Parkinson’s disease, network analysis identified the primary motor cortex, left thalamus, brainstem, and right subthalamic nucleus as central regions.
  • In major depressive disorder, central regions included the bilateral amygdala, middle frontal gyrus, and frontal operculum cortex.
  • External networks showed basal ganglia engagement in Parkinson’s disease, limbic engagement in major depressive disorder, and shared salience, cerebellar, and default mode networks.

Why it matters

The findings frame DBS outcomes as related not only to the stimulation target but also to the broader pre-operative circuitry on which stimulation acts. This network perspective may help explain variation in surgical benefit across patients and provides a basis for investigating whether imaging can support more individualized selection, although the proposed application remains to be validated.

What to keep in mind

The synthesis relies on reported neuroimaging regions and normative connectivity analyses; the abstract states that imaging-informed patient selection requires further validation.

Source

Published in Neurosci Biobehav Rev. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Neurology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.