Efficacy and neural mechanisms of transcranial direct current stimulation for social function in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Psychiatr ResSep 12, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchPsychiatryPediatrics

Hanying Zhao, Haomiao Niu, Yi Jiang et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for social functioning and neurophysiological outcomes in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. It included 13 randomized controlled trials involving 357 participants aged 4–21 years. tDCS was associated with improved social functioning (SMD = -0.51, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.0002) and significant overall neurofunctional modulation (SMD = 1.03, I 2 = 71.9%, p = 0.004). However, neurobiological and behavioral effect sizes were not significantly correlated across studies, and consistency varied between individual studies.

Key findings

  • Social functioning improved with tDCS (SMD = -0.51, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.0002).
  • Overall neurofunctional modulation was significant, with substantial heterogeneity (SMD = 1.03, I 2 = 71.9%, p = 0.004).
  • Neurobiological and behavioral effect sizes were not significantly correlated across studies (r = 0.19, p = 0.760).
  • Of five studies assessed for individual-level consistency, two were fully consistent, two partially consistent, and one inconsistent.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that tDCS may affect social functioning in young people with autism, while measured neural responses do not yet provide a clear cross-study explanation for behavioral effects. The differing results across neurophysiological modalities and variable study-level consistency underscore the need for standardized outcome measures before neural changes can be interpreted reliably or used to guide intervention research.

What to keep in mind

The evidence comes from 13 trials with 357 participants, and neurofunctional results were heterogeneous. Individual-level consistency was assessed in only five studies; ERP findings were based on limited data (k = 2).

Source

Published in J Psychiatr Res. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Psychiatry

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.