APOE ε4 variant interpretation and protein numbering discrepancy: a case report.

Mol Biol RepSep 22, 2026 (epub)
Case ReportMedical GeneticsNeurologyOpen access

Burak Dagdelen, Cihat Ozguncu, Ayse Gul Zamani et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

Case in brief

A 57-year-old man with early-onset Alzheimer's disease underwent next-generation sequencing, revealing a homozygous APOE variant annotated as p.Cys130Arg. This variant corresponds to the APOE ε4-defining rs429358 variant, which is often reported as Cys112Arg in the mature protein sequence. Initially classified as a variant of uncertain significance, further review clarified that both annotations refer to the same allele.

Diagnostic / clinical pearl

Clinicians should be aware that discrepancies in protein numbering can lead to misinterpretation of genetic variants, emphasizing the need for comprehensive genomic analysis.

Why it matters

Understanding the implications of different protein numbering conventions is crucial for accurate genetic counseling and risk assessment in Alzheimer's disease.

Source

Published in Mol Biol Rep. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Medical Genetics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.