Characterizing accuracy, retention, and dose-response of an 18-session real-time gait biofeedback program following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Clin Biomech (Bristol)Sep 20, 2026 (epub)

Sergio A Lemus, Annika Kullstam, Hayley P Smitheman et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized controlled trial characterized accuracy, retention, and training dose in 13 people who had completed rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and showed reduced involved-limb loading during walking. Participants received 18 sessions of bilateral real-time gait biofeedback over 6 weeks, targeting a first peak vertical ground reaction force of 1.15 body weight. Target accuracy rose from approximately 13% in session 1 and plateaued at 20–25% by session 12. Involved-limb loading was higher than baseline at retention testing from session 3 onward, and the median effective dose was 5 sessions (95% confidence interval: 3-14 sessions).

Key findings

  • Target accuracy in both limbs increased from ∼13% in session 1 and plateaued at 20-25% by session 12.
  • Involved-limb first peak vertical ground reaction force was significantly higher than baseline at retention testing from session 3 through session 18.
  • The median effective dose to achieve target loading was 5 sessions (95% confidence interval: 3-14 sessions).

Why it matters

The findings suggest that gait biofeedback can improve involved-limb loading before a full 18-session course is completed, while also showing that precise step-level target attainment remained limited. The reported dose estimate offers a starting point for designing future trials of shorter regimens, but does not establish an optimal clinical schedule or demonstrate broader functional benefit.

What to keep in mind

The study included only 13 participants, limiting the precision and generalizability of its dose and retention estimates.

Source

Published in Clin Biomech (Bristol). This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.