Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in iran: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mult Scler Relat DisordSep 4, 2026 (epub)

Parviz Karimi, Zahra Nourollahi, Milad Azami

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis updated estimates of multiple sclerosis (MS) prevalence and incidence in Iran. It included 56 articles comprising 142 individual studies. Across 139 studies, pooled prevalence was 33.7 per 100,000 population (95%CI: 30.9-39.0); across 80 studies, pooled incidence was 4.2/ 100,000 (95%CI: 2.7-6.6). Estimates were higher in women than men for both measures. Meta-regression found statistically significant upward trends in prevalence and incidence over time (P < 0.001).

Key findings

  • Pooled MS prevalence was 33.7 per 100,000 population (95%CI: 30.9-39.0), based on 139 studies.
  • Prevalence was 23.8/ 100,000 (95%CI: 21.0-27.0) in men and 76.0/ 100,000 (95%CI: 67.5-85.5) in women.
  • Pooled incidence was 4.2/ 100,000 (95%CI: 2.7-6.6), based on 80 studies; incidence was 2.2/ 100,000 in men and 6.7/100,000 in women.
  • Meta-regression indicated upward trends in both prevalence and incidence over time (P < 0.001).

Why it matters

These pooled estimates describe the reported burden of MS in Iran and show that both prevalence and incidence have risen over time. The sex differences and temporal trends can inform population-level surveillance and help frame investigation of context-specific risk factors. Because the estimates combine multiple studies, they summarize evidence across settings rather than describing an individual patient's risk.

What to keep in mind

The estimates pool results from multiple studies; the abstract does not report study-level heterogeneity or explain how differences in methods and populations may affect the pooled estimates.

Source

Published in Mult Scler Relat Disord. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Neurology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.