Is ultra-early endoscopy always beneficial? A systematic review and meta-analysis of timing-dependent outcomes in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Cai-Juan Liu, Lu-Xi Xiong, Xiang-Yu Zhang et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of ultra-early endoscopy (≤6 hours) versus early endoscopy (>6 hours) on clinical outcomes in adults with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). Analyzing data from 9 studies with 10,785 patients, the results indicated no significant reduction in mortality (OR 0.88) or rebleeding (OR 1.23), but a higher rate of ICU admissions (OR 1.41) in the ultra-early group.
Key findings
- Ultra-early endoscopy did not significantly reduce mortality (OR 0.88, 95% CI [0.58-1.34]).
- There was no significant difference in rebleeding rates (OR 1.23, 95% CI [0.90-1.67]).
- ICU admission was more frequent in the ultra-early group (OR 1.41, 95% CI [1.20-1.66]).
- No impact on transfusion, surgical intervention, repeat endoscopy, or length of hospital stay.
Why it matters
Understanding the timing of endoscopy in NVUGIB is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. This study suggests that ultra-early endoscopy may not confer additional benefits, highlighting the need for careful patient management and resource allocation.