Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy With Plastic Stent Versus Metallic Stent for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis.
Hirofumi Yamazaki, Masahiro Itonaga, Ke Wan et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of plastic versus metal stents in endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) for malignant biliary obstruction. The analysis included six studies, revealing that the time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) was significantly longer for metal stents (hazard ratio 1.83; 95% CI 1.42-2.36) compared to plastic stents.
Key findings
- Metal stents had a significantly longer TRBO than plastic stents (hazard ratio 1.83; 95% CI 1.42-2.36).
- The adverse event rate was significantly higher in the metal stent group (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.30-0.77).
- Plastic stents had a higher recurrent biliary obstruction rate compared to metal stents (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.06-2.88).
- No significant differences were found in clinical success or re-intervention success rates.
Why it matters
Understanding the differences in outcomes between plastic and metal stents in EUS-HGS can guide clinicians in selecting the appropriate stent type for patients with malignant biliary obstruction, balancing efficacy and safety.