Feasibility of deep learning reconstruction algorithm combined with the "ultra triple-low" protocol at 60 kVp in CTPA: An image quality and radiation dose assessment.

Eur J RadiolSep 29, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchRadiology (Diagnostic)

Zhichao Liu, Qin Wang, Xianying Ning et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomised controlled trial assessed whether deep learning reconstruction could support pulmonary CT angiography using 60 kVp, 10 ml of iodine contrast, and a 2.5 ml/s injection rate. Seventy patients with BMI < 28 kg/m² were assigned to the ultra triple-low protocol or a standard protocol; the low-dose group was reconstructed using three methods. With deep learning reconstruction, image-quality measures and subjective scores were superior to the other low-dose reconstructions, and all pulmonary artery CT values exceeded 250 HU. The ultra triple-low protocol reduced effective dose by 84.93 % (0.71 ± 0.09 vs. 4.71 ± 1.13 mSv) and contrast volume by 66.7 % (10 ml vs. 30 ml).

Key findings

  • The ultra triple-low group had an effective dose of 0.71 ± 0.09 vs. 4.71 ± 1.13 mSv, a reported reduction of 84.93 % (P < 0.001).
  • Contrast volume was 10 ml vs. 30 ml, a reported reduction of 66.7 %.
  • With deep learning reconstruction, all pulmonary artery CT values exceeded 250 HU, and SNR, CNR, subjective scores, and artifact scores were superior (P < 0.001).
  • Inter-observer agreement was strong, with κ = 0.87-0.92.

Why it matters

CTPA requires adequate pulmonary artery enhancement while limiting radiation and contrast exposure. These results suggest that deep learning reconstruction may help maintain diagnostic image quality with substantially lower doses in selected patients. The findings are relevant to protocol development, but the study’s population and conclusion do not establish performance in all patients or clinical settings.

What to keep in mind

The trial included only patients with BMI < 28 kg/m², and the authors state that further validation is warranted.

Source

Published in Eur J Radiol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Radiology (Diagnostic)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.