Balloon Enteroscopy-Assisted ERCP and EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction in Patients With Surgically Altered Anatomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Masahiro Itonaga, Ke Wan, Tamura Takashi et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (BEA-ERCP) versus EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) for malignant biliary obstruction in patients with surgically altered anatomy. The analysis included 13 studies, revealing that EUS-BD had a higher pooled technical success rate of 97% compared to 75% for BEA-ERCP.
Key findings
- Pooled technical success rates were 75% for BEA-ERCP and 97% for EUS-BD.
- Pooled clinical success rates were 72% for BEA-ERCP and 92% for EUS-BD.
- Adverse event rates were 11% for BEA-ERCP and 17% for EUS-BD.
- Recurrent biliary obstruction rates were 26% for BEA-ERCP and 23% for EUS-BD.
Why it matters
Understanding the comparative effectiveness of BEA-ERCP and EUS-BD is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies for malignant biliary obstruction, particularly in patients with altered anatomy, where procedural success can significantly impact patient outcomes.