Preoperative CA15-3 as a predictor of axillary lymph node metastasis and prognosis in women with breast cancer: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis.

Breast CancerOct 5, 2026 (epub)

Mansour Bahardoust, Anita Rezaei, Anahita Hosseinali et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This GRADE-assessed systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis examined cohort studies of preoperative CA15-3 in women with breast cancer, assessing survival and metastatic outcomes. Across 31 studies comprising 178,047 patients, elevated CA15-3 was associated with worse overall survival (HR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.67-2.15), poorer disease-free survival, and greater metastasis risk. The strongest reported association was with axillary lymph node metastasis (OR: 3.08; 95% CI: 2.09-4.08). Findings were consistent across regions, although age, tumor stage, and CA15-3 cutoff contributed to heterogeneity.

Key findings

  • Elevated CA15-3 was associated with worse overall survival (HR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.67-2.15).
  • Elevated CA15-3 was associated with poorer disease-free survival (HR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.78-2.31).
  • The pooled association with axillary lymph node metastasis was OR: 3.08; 95% CI: 2.09-4.08.
  • Elevated CA15-3 was associated with increased metastasis risk overall (OR: 2.73; 95% CI: 2.04-3.42).

Why it matters

Axillary nodal involvement and survival are clinically important outcomes in breast cancer. The pooled associations suggest preoperative CA15-3 may provide prognostic information alongside tumor characteristics, while variation related to age, stage, and assay cutoff underscores the need for careful interpretation. The evidence concerns associations and does not establish that CA15-3 can replace invasive nodal assessment.

What to keep in mind

The evidence came from cohort studies, and heterogeneity was linked to age, tumor stage, and CA15-3 cutoff. Prospective validation is warranted.

Source

Published in Breast Cancer. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.