Finite Versus Indefinite Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy in HBeAg‑Negative Chronic Hepatitis B: Meta‑Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Demver P Gomez, Wilmyr F Hababag
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of finite versus continuous nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in HBeAg-negative adults with chronic hepatitis B. Analyzing data from four randomized controlled trials involving 357 participants, the study found that discontinuation of therapy increased HBsAg loss (RR 5.02), but also significantly raised the risk of virologic relapse (RR 23.09) and retreatment (RR 21.94).
Key findings
- Discontinuation of therapy increased HBsAg loss compared to continuation (RR 5.02).
- Finite therapy significantly increased the risk of virologic relapse (RR 23.09).
- Retreatment rates were also higher with finite therapy (RR 21.94).
- No serious adverse events or hepatic decompensation were reported.
Why it matters
Understanding the balance between potential benefits and risks of finite nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy is crucial for clinicians managing chronic hepatitis B, particularly in selecting appropriate treatment strategies for patients aiming for functional cure.