Comparison of two repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation protocols for upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized trial.

PLoS OneOct 8, 2026 (epub)

Thitirut Jongutchariya, Surapa Hangsaphruek, Thawisak Wongkiratimethawi et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This single-centre, assessor-blinded randomized trial compared 10- and 15-minute repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) protocols, each given weekly for 4 weeks alongside stretching, in adults aged 18–55 with chronic upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome. Among 66 randomized participants, pain, pressure pain threshold, and neck disability improved over time in both groups. At week 4, VAS pain fell by 4.87 points with the 15-minute protocol and 5.02 points with the 10-minute protocol; the adjusted between-group difference was -0.27 (95% CI -0.95-0.40; p = 0.43).

Key findings

  • VAS pain decreased from baseline by 4.87 points with 15-minute rPMS and 5.02 points with 10-minute rPMS at week 4.
  • The adjusted week-4 between-group VAS difference was -0.27 (95% CI -0.95-0.40; p = 0.43).
  • Across both groups, pressure pain threshold increased by 2.51 kg/cm² and Neck Disability Index decreased by 9.15 points.
  • No significant group-by-time interactions were found for VAS, pressure pain threshold, or neck disability.

Why it matters

The trial suggests that both tested rPMS durations, when combined with stretching, can accompany short-term improvements in pain and related measures in chronic upper trapezius myofascial pain. The absence of detected differences between durations may inform consideration of treatment time, but does not establish that the protocols are equivalent or that either is superior to stretching alone.

What to keep in mind

The single-centre trial included 66 participants and assessed outcomes only through week 4; it compared two rPMS durations alongside stretching, without a stretching-only control.

Source

Published in PLoS One. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.