Genotype-informed docosahexaenoic acid dosing based on the FADS Indel to reduce preterm and prolonged gestation: A secondary analysis of the ADORE randomized trial.

PLoS MedOct 8, 2026 (epub)

Yan Ning Li, Kumar S D Kothapalli, Susan E Carlson et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This post hoc secondary analysis of the multicentre ADORE randomised trial examined whether FADS Indel genotype modified the association between DHA dose and gestational outcomes. Among 761 participants with genetic data, those carrying an I allele assigned 1,000 mg/d DHA had lower early preterm birth (EPB) than I-allele carriers assigned 200 mg/d: 1.1% (2/205) versus 4.3% (9/214). High-dose DHA was associated with more births at ≥40 weeks among D/D participants. Genotype-by-dose interactions were supported for EPB and prolonged gestation, but not for preterm birth overall.

Key findings

  • Among I-allele carriers, EPB was 1.1% (2/205) with 1,000 mg/d DHA versus 4.3% (9/214) with 200 mg/d.
  • In I-allele carriers, preterm birth was 9.3% (19/205) with high-dose DHA versus 14.5% (31/214) with low-dose DHA.
  • Genotype-by-dose interaction posterior probabilities were 0.99 for EPB and 0.98 for prolonged gestation; the interaction was not supported for preterm birth (PP = 0.56).
  • Birth at ≥40 weeks was more frequent in the high-dose D/D group.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that genetic variation may help explain differing gestational responses to DHA dose, with potential relevance to both early delivery and prolonged gestation. This is clinically important because the analysis points toward a possible way to tailor supplementation rather than assuming a uniform response. However, the results are exploratory and do not establish a genotype-guided dosing strategy.

What to keep in mind

This was a post hoc secondary analysis, and genotype-by-dose comparisons were not a prespecified trial aim. Some subgroups had few preterm and early preterm events; the authors call for prospective confirmation.

Source

Published in PLoS Med. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Medical Genetics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.